'Do Black People Have Equality with Whit People in the Us in Teh 21st Century? Essay\r'

'I would agree with this statement only when I would besides think in that location are aspects of the locating of char raft that did convert in these years and the impacts of which could be debated. In 1945, the Second World fight ended. sick hoi polloi’s billet hadn’t changed but their attitudes had. They started to question why they were fighting for freedom in former(a) countries, against the Nazi oppression of minorities (mainly Jewish), when they didn’t plain have it at home? The state of war bidd a basis for the complaisant rights driving force to argue their strip for equality.\r\nHowever, the threat of communism to the Ameri squirts was genuinely real, they devotioned it would take over their capitalist government and traditions of ‘freedom’. The threat was real serious to the regular army as can be seen over the succeeding(a) decade, with the Korean war in 1953 where the country was break down in half between com munist and capitalist and the whole of the Cold War (1947-1991 approx). This fear of communism was lend oneselfd against groups much(prenominal) as the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of one-sided People) and as a result they were outlaw in Alabama in 1956.\r\n utilize communism to dirty the reputations of foul organisations was putting green and quite effective due to the fear of it, heightened thanks to Joseph McCarthy. McCarthy was a senator who accused members of the united States government of being communist or being Soviet spies. It could be express that they were gaining enough influence/importance to be considered a threat and banned which, in turn, could show almost progress. Education was a major part of the courtly rights movement. Schools were single out and variation was current throughout some of the southern states.\r\nCases like the B pathn vs. capital of Kansas case in 1954 could ch entirelyenge the ‘ start out but equal’ i dea easily and had a good chance of amiable, and of proving discrimination. dreary schools were vastly different to clear schools particularly in funding, each white tike would be ‘worth’ over $ ascorbic acid more than a portentous child. B deficiency classes were overcrowded and black teachers got paid inwardnessfully less. This meant that they were non given the same opportunities as white children. The Brown vs.\r\nTopeka case challenged all this but turn there was change in legal terms (de jure), it influenced the til nowts at Little Rock and was a winning case for the civil rights movement, there was little change in peoples opinions and the status and handling of black people (de facto) and progress was very slow with much white resistance. nearly schools even closed down so they wouldn’t have to enrol black students, and there was an influx in Klu Klux Klan members and besides the setting up of White Citizens Councils. This showed that gal ore(postnominal) whites did non want these changes to happen and would go to great lengths to resist them.\r\nAn new(prenominal) bear-sized problem, where black people were treated as inferior, was the segregation on buses and on open transport. Many black people could not afford private cars and lived some infinite from their employment due to the separate areas where white and black had to live. Because of this 75% of local bus revenue was gained from black people. Despite the superior black to white ratio of use on the bus there were morose rules ,regarding seating, much(prenominal) as having to give up the seat, or not allowed to sit next to or in the same row as a white person. This did not change much in the years 1945- 1955 apart from the boycott in verge rouge, Louisiana.\r\nSimilar to the boycott in capital of Alabama dickens years later (Martin Luther queer was inspired by this idea and also how they organised car-pooling), in Baton Rouge local bus companies suff ered a significant loss of money and were forced to compromise with black people. While the first two rows of the bus were still reserved for whites and black people still had to enter from the back, the actuateionateness seats were on first stimulate basis. Although not as victorious as the Montgomery Bus Boycott 2 years later, it provided a yardping stone for the civil rights movement and showed that peaceful protest could achieve, up to now limited, results.\r\nHowever this happened in one indicate and received little or no media coverage and this meant the rest of America didn’t know about it and it didn’t affect them. Conditions for black people stayed the same. It is, in my opinion, not accurate to say the status of black people changed due to President Truman. Instead, the sensation of black discrimination increased. Although there are doubts about Truman’s real motives for his region in trying to fight racism. He established a mission for civi l rights called United States Commission On cultured Rights.\r\nThe FECP which released a report titled ‘To secure These Rights’ in 1947, in which problems and solutions to combat discrimination were outlined. This was a dangerous move for Truman and his lack of support especially from the south do it difficult to follow through with the solutions his committee proposed. He used his authority to commix the army. This however was not as successful at first as umteen people (even top army generals) resisted it for as long as they could and there was still the same amount of racism.\r\nIt did change the status of black soldiers because they, technically, were on the same train as white soldiers. Another social function that Truman did was integrate his inauguration, which seems like a slim step but a step none the less showed that he was do a point against segregation. So while he did open the public’s eyes to the racism and discrimination that happened, in some ways he didn’t particularly change the status and even made it worse in some ways. For example some slums were knocked down to lay down better housing but the modification built was more spacious meaning less houses and many people were go forth homeless.\r\nIn conclusion, the status of black people did not change a diffuse in the years 1945-1955 even though there were some important breakthroughs, such as the Brown vs Topeka case and Truman’s attempts at reform. However I believe these attempts didn’t change the factual status of black people and the attitudes towards them by white people. Some could argue that the views of the USA were hypocritical, when fighting for freedom in other countries but couldn’t even provide equality at home. The years interest 1955 saw the civil rights movement nag up and changes in society.\r\n'