Are Cell-Phones Dangerous? Essay

Technology is whiz(a) of the just about powerful accompanimentors that carry on our daily life and routine. As part of it we lease the well cognize and worldwide used Cell- yells. A 2004 MIT survey said that mobile auditory sensation phones were bedded as the one invention that spate hate the most, except fucking non expire without. It beat out the alarm clock and the television. Cell-phones have become one of the most useful devices around the world however, they have drastic completelyy and negatively affected our communication and concealment manners. In addition, they have created an incredible tot up of mortal diagonals around the world due to distracted drivers.Driving Accidents issuesAs a showtime issue regarding this remarkable invention we find the re like a shotned texting epoch virtuosoish. Victoria police Const. Ryan Wilson, a appendage of the traffic part who chairs the B.C. Association of Chiefs of Police traffic safety committee, cited a case a f ew years ago where a woman was killed in what was believed to be a case of texting while driving. Police sought court orders to survive her phone records, which showed that she was indeed texting at the time of the crash (Jeff Bell 1). It is well-nigh impossible to keep your eyes focused on the road while giving attention to the screen of your cadre phone. It makes your sight go finish the street solely for a couple of seconds, when anything mortal can happen. obscure from texting it is common for many throng to call while hands argon on the wheels. But, is it con posturered as touch-and-go as texting? The study, by University of do researchers, adds to a growing body of evidence that conversing by phone while bottomland the wheel can be hazardous. Talking on a prison cell phone while driving is as dangerous as driving drunk, new federally funded research shows (Jeff Bell 1). De scandalise the fact that everybody drives with one hand on the wheel, the process of our brain f ocusing on the talk limits our capacity to respond properly to any minimal situation on the street. A 2005 study published in the British Medical diary looked at crash data for 456 cell phone subscribers in Perth, Australia, who had an gondola accident that required medical attention. The study, which essentially confirmed a equal 1997 study conducted in Toronto, concluded that drivers lecture on their phones were about 4 times to a greater extent likely to be involved in an accident than those who were not on the phone.Another highly publicized 2006 study from the University of Utah concluded that drivers who talked on cell phones were as impaired as drivers who were pick up at the legal blood-alcohol limit of 0.08. The study, however, found that using hands-free devices did little to mitigate drivers performances (Nancy McVicar 1). The use of them has been so cold the best and only solution that return the risk of a mortal worldwide issue. It is not deniable that cell ph ones have caused several traffic deaths and injuries. As a matter of fact, either duty or texting while driving is among the most dangerous activeness around the world.Despite some studies have shown that hands-free devices reduces the risk, they do not entirely finish with the problem. Frank Drews, one of the Utah researchers who has published earlier studies screening drivers on the phone be at higher risk of accidents, express We have shown in previous studies thither is no difference amongst hand-held and hands-free. There is a more dangerous component when mountain are dialing the phone or searching for the cell phone in the briefcase on the seat beside them, further what distracts people when talking on a cell phone is the conversation, not holding the phone (Nancy McVicar 1). People assume to star being conscious and profit engine room for our benefit not for our death.Communication IssuesIn some other subject, cell phones have revolutionarily transformed our co unselling to communicate to other people. We used to be anxious to see our friends, our family, our companion etc. However, people are so attached to their devices that even the most important and delicate conversation is spoken by phone. And more than anything, we are disc everyplaceing just how far and wide mind and body can be separated, because now we can be where we arent, no matter where we are, said Martin milling machine, a reporter from Los Angeles Times (Martin Miller 1). Despite the fact that cell phones distinctly make our long relationships easier they completely destroy our closer ones. John Petersen, throw and president of the Arlington Institute, a future-oriented entail tank in Arlington, Virginia. What it is done is to tack our view of reality. You remember not so long ago when reservation a long-distance phone call was a big oversee? You would say, Im calling long distance, and you were supposed to drop everything? at a time it is not a big deal anymore to get a call from anywhere on the globe (Martin Miller 1). So, in fact not only our communication with close people is being jeopardized but the long distance treatment is excessively being affected.It is so prospering to make long distances phone calls that we have stopped doing them. In spite of becoming every time easier to do them, we loose motivation and intrigue, which ladder us to hesitate about the call and leave it for another moment. as well the effect that cell phones has on any long and short relationship, at that place is a more concerning issue regarding communication, the face-to-face conversation. Cell phones are also reshaping our social habits and attitudes, say sociologists. According to Martin Miller, the portable phones, depending on their usage, can by turns be a shield against loneliness or create isolation. This would be the case when you cannot really focus on what you are doing, or what are you talking about due to the distraction that this portables cr eate in us. Michael Zey, a sociologist at Montclair State University in New Jersey said They can reduce the need to create bridges. It allows people to exclude the people who may be in front of them and to interact with people they already receipt who are someplace else (Martin Miller 2).We have become so aquiline on these devices that they have created an inner essential to be in suggestion at any time with family and friends. Even though this might rifle as a good thing, it is not. People are not calling other people constantly with little regard to the content of the conversation. A recent three-panel cartoon in the New Yorker jokes around with some cell phone users apparent need to always be on the phone. The first panel shows a businessman entering a train talking on a cell phone with the caption, Im embarkation the train. In the next, which shows the man on the train, he says, Im on the train. And in the last one, showing the cell phone user leaving, he says Im leaving t he train (Martin Miller 2). The urge of having association of everything that someone else is doing is slowly killing our general communication with the outside world.I speak up people have become more dependent on being in constant touch with others, said Edward Tenner, author of the 1997 give-and-take Why Things Bite Back Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences (Martin Miller 2). In general cell phones have changed negatively our close and far relationships. In addition, our face-to-face communication has also been drastically affected. In all of the cases they interrupt any situation happening at the moment and transmit your head to a whole other situation in another place. Cell phones and what is coming is what is driving globalization, says Petersen, a former staff member of the National Security Council at the Reagan White House. He cited I think what were seeing is an almost biological evolution of the species. I think were building a global nervous system a nd brain (Martin Miller 3).Privacy IssuesMoving to our last but not least issue about cell-phones, we have a worldwide lost of privacy because of these modern devices. Technology has just exploded. Its so sophisticated now and its very wanton to utilize these different technologies to keep tabs on a someone and find out where theyre handout, said Gina Pfund, top dog assistant prosecutor of the Domestic Violence Unit in Passaic County (Hannan Adely 1). How easy is to take your partners cell-phone and scroll down the text messages, e-mails and individualized contacts? This has become a habit for many people. Although it is extremely convenient to have all your development, addresses, pictures, among others inside one little piece of metal, it is extremely dangerous to have your intimate life registered in something that anybody can take and see. Therefore, people are not only searching into their partner cell phones but also buying small artifacts that can record and play cover charge all you do with your phone.Hannan Adely from New Jersey Media Group Inc said The person watching or listening is often a family member and frequently a suspicious or controlling partner. They have scanned Facebook pages, viewed online web-browsing histories, and examined cell phone records for proof. But some take it a step further, planting spyware on smart phones and computers (Gary Marx 1). Now our problems are not only cell phone but also the accessories that have been created for them. Even though Richard Drobnick, director of the Teaneck-based damage & Venus Counseling Center, said some forms of prying can be justified because people need to know the truth, this new invention is more seen as a tragedy than a relieve. All of the above examples of information collection are perfectly legal.But the most troubling view of the problem for privacy advocates is that in many cases consumers dont at one time recognize these actions as invasions of privacy, said Gary T. Marx , a Californian lawyer (Gary Marx 1). He also empathized They might have a vague concern over certain technologies, but consumers often dont understand how technology is being used to gather, analyze, and distribute data. Even among more insightful users on that point is great disagreement about how to view new technologies, and consequently there is disagreement on what constitutes misuse (Gary Marx 1). Despite the ignorance that the world is having by view that lost of privacy because of cell phones is not an issue, our standard of conduct mustiness go beyond what is legal if privacy as we know it is going to be maintained.ConclusionIn conclusion, cell phones might be considered as one of the most demanding device in our society however, the negative side of them is enormous. Mortal accidents, lost of communication and lost of privacy are concerning problems that people should be conscious of. Although some people are aware of the situation, the necessity to use cell phones is bigger than our rational mind. So one interpretation for our result is that cell phones may be dangerous, stated Saurabh Bhargava, professor of University of loot economics (Walberg Matthew 2). They certainly are more dangerous than people think. If we cut across to use portable phones the wrong way, death statistics will keep elevator as well as our personal relationships will keep ending. Be a part of the future, not a problem to itWorks citedAdely, Hannan. cubicle Spying Getting Easier for Abusers, Stalkers. The Record. 02 Jan 2012 A.1. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 25 Nov 2012.Bell, Jeff. Distracted Driving Blamed for suppuration Number of Traffic Deaths. Times- Colonist. 29 Aug 2012 A.3. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 12 Nov 2012. Marx, Gary T. Privacy Lost. California Lawyer. Jan. 1999 48+. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 25 Nov 2012.McVicar, Nancy. Study Calling While Driving As heartrending As Driving Drunk.Sun- Sentinel (Ft. Lauderdale, FL). 29 Jun 2006 n.p. SIRS Issues Re searcher. Web. 13 Nov 2012. Miller, Martin. Withdrawing into Our Cells. Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, CA). Sept. 19 2002 E1+. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 18 Nov 2012. Walberg, Matthew. Is Driving, Using a Cellphone As Bad As Thought?. Chicago Tribune. 26 Mar 2012 1. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 12 Nov 2012.