Rhetorical Analysis on “An Elementary School in Slum Essay

The poem An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum by Stephen Spender, begins with a stanza depicting the worrying curb of the students in elementary prepare. As the poem extends further, Spender points out the corruptions in the Government and accuses it for paying little attention to childrens education and haleness conditions. He argues that the children should break through the project of slum, and embrace the beauty of nature. In the slum, Children do non have pleasant moments they are farthermost off from the gusty waves, and far away from the fields and playgrounds that supposed to accompany them on their childhood memories.They also do not have healthy bodies. A simile compares their hair to rootles weed, which shows that the children are severely malnourished, and are not taken care of. The boy is paper- weighming, and of twisted bones. The tall daughter with her weighed-down head implies the fact that she might be looked down by others, and she is physiologically an d psychologically fatigue. However, there is one unnoted, sweet and young kid, at the butt of the classroom, whose eyes live in a hallucination, of squirrels game. We backside see a glimmer of hope from this sweet kid, however, we are not undisputable if he is simply lost in the squirrels game.The school is poorly equipped with donations such as Shakespeares portrait that decorates on the sour cream walls. The picture of cloudless at dawn, civilized covered stadium riding all cities is in sharp contrast to the dusty switch and shabby building of elementary school in reality. The kids incoming is multi-coloured with a fog under a lead sky. The depiction of dark sky created an atmosphere of despair and hopelessness. Not unaccompanied the childrens future is foggy and blurred, but also their lives are monotonous and insipid, far far from rivers, capes, and the stars of words. The children are confined to the school in slum as well as their imagination. William Shakespeare, the greatest playwright and poet in English language, is wicked to them, because they cannot care for the splendidness of language. And the subprogram is a bad example, with ships and sun and love tempting them to steal. The function gives children the taste of charming nature however, instead of igniting the light of hope, it falsely tempts the children to take over their goals even at the cost of stealing. They live in cramped holes, a limited and narrow space, with slag heap all around them.Their deliberate environment and living conditions are horrible, that they cannot maintain healthy body, let simply receiving appropriate education. Their future is like mended glass, foggy and blurred, full of despair. The school completely operates when governor, teacher, inspector, visitor come to observe, so it does not provide serious teaching. Consequently, this subprogram becomes their window and these windows that shut upon their lives like catacombs. The slum limits the stud ents horizon, like catacombs, and the maps are the only way for them to see the world outside.They live in a dream that can never come true as long as they are still in the slum. At last, the poet envisions the students break through the confinement of slum, and finally they can embrace the beautiful nature, that was once on the map but far away from them. Spender harshly criticizes the governments nonchalance towards the poverty-stricken children, and he appeals to all the people to pay more(prenominal) attention to the children and help ameliorate their education and health conditions. So that they can show the children green fields and make their world run colourize on gold sands, and let their tongues run naked into books.