Making Connections Essay

In Werner, Hoeflich is sharing genuinely(prenominal) intimate and specific expand virtu in ally his experience. byssus Probably met Hoeflich on several occasions in order of battle to go on his trust forwards he was capable to collect some of the details that he included in his work. It most likely took byssus geezerhood of asking just the right questions to write Werner. In this piece, Werner is presented as some(prenominal) weak and strong. In the beginning of the story, he is completely caught off make by the fire in his home, but then the author follows with a story of Werrner cliff diving.Beard describes Werner diving out of his apartment windowpane with athletic elegance, and then proceeds to tell us about Werner call in the ambulance. At the end of the story, Beard describes Werner never existence able to confuse himself with the old Werner. I am left wonder what Werner did by and by his accident. We know he always felt pain since, but I wonder in what other w ays it affected his life. Zinner emphasizes balancing quotes with narrations which Beard did actually well.He also spoke of non changing the quotes in order to preserve the characters voice. Beard did a very beloved job of depicting Werners personality through the quotes he chose. 2. Gladwell began the piece by describing an event very vaguely, and then slowly gave us more details. He ended the story by teaching us one of the lessons that Cesar learned through his experience. I like that Gladwell keeps us wonder at the beginning of his piece. He could be talking about whatever number of things.I liked the ending because the reading was able to go steady another side of Cesar. Bow, not only was he an expert on dog behavior he knew quite a bit about human behavior as well. I didnt like that he chose to describe Cesar in his introduction. I also didnt like that in the conclusion, he told a story of Cesar failing to be able to do his job. I would throw off draw Cesar after I fini shed recounting the story of Sugar and Lynda. I would ache told the story of Cesar failing before I talked about Cesar learning about human behavior.Gladwell did a good job of hooking the ratifier. After the first sentence, I was left wondering what Gladwell was talking about. He also did a good job of lettered when to end the story. If he had continued on for much longer, the reader would have lost interest. 3. Ingrams message was that this was she experienced was a very enigmatic time for everyone. Not all Germans hated Jews, and not all Jews resented Americans. She treasured to provide a different perspective on the war than the ones we visualize most often.When I was finished reading this piece, I felt a sense of sadness. Ingram wanted us to see that although the Hamburg people were grateful for creation saved, they were still haunted by the sight of their dead neighbors and friends. In order for any good to come, sacrifices had to be made. Ingram begins her memoir with a story of her bravely saving her mothers life and uses very frank and bold language in order to establish power. Zinner recommends that an author write without being to egotistical and to use vivid sight and smell language.Ingram did a very good job of painting a picture in the readers mind without making herself the hero in every situation. 4. Rodriguez was trying to tell us that there is a big change orgasm in California and in America. No longer do you have to come to California to live your dream. A person can go along at home and achieve it just as easily, but entert be surprised when it doesnt come true. I hypothesize that the audience had a love/hate relationship with this piece. They thought it was beautifully written and brought up excellent points, but hated to admit that what Rodriguez was look was true.In describing East Cobb, I would use the terms large houses, dissipated food, many cultures, crowded schools, crowded streets, expensive cats, large lawns, famil y secrets, intelligent kids, and medicine abuse. Rodriguez described the California that we all know, but he also went deeper and described to us in great detail the California that very a few(prenominal) people see. 5. Singer posed a question. Then, he spent a paragraph or two answering the question. He did this repeatedly passim his work and added supporting details along the way. Singer gave a very convincing argument.He appealed to the emotions of a sensitive reader with the child in the pond analogy. HE appealed to the logic of a skeptical reader with all his statistics. This article would persuade most people to be more charitable. It would not provide a very convincing argument to the people with demoralise incomes. Singer did a very good job of cutting the clutter. He used simple language and said exactly what he meant. I also felt Singers personality through his writing. He is very realistic and believes that we should all be more charitable.